Voting Electronically In The Next Election?

Take a look in the mirror and what do you see? A person who votes online, from the comfort of their own home? I don’t know because I don’t read the Mirror. Ha ha, see what I did there? I know, this is precisely the reason I have a blog and not a newspaper column.

Nevertheless, today we’re living in an age where you can tell your car to start running your bath when you’re driving home from the office- and you’re not even driving. So why, in 2017- do we not have online voting? This seems like one of the crazy ways our modern age doesn’t add up, but I would prefer to keep it this way- and here’s why:

I like to think that I’m a responsible teenager, not perfect, but pretty responsible. I occasionally do the dishes and take the washing out- and I’m not a racist. Just to put that out there. But even for a non-racist, lightly helpful around the house teenager like me, I have carried out several actions using the power of the internet that I somewhat regret. One of these such times was when I signed a petition calling for the production, distribution, and purchasing of Cannabis to be legalised. I also nearly ordered a combat knife by mistake.

Credit: Clipart Panda

It seemed like a good idea at the time. I mean, I’m still pretty sure that alcohol causes more related deaths than hemp– but someone should probably look at the full medical effect it has on the body before making this call. I will also add that I don’t smoke weed, but see nothing wrong with anyone who does. Unless they smoke a lot- then they’re a bit dopey. Literally.

Basically, that was a long way of saying that online, a culture can build up of pointing and clicking without thinking. The Internet is the ultimate tool for self sufficiency, but this often means that you’re busy reading other people’s viewpoints- so there’s no need for your own research. I also want to say that signing an online petition wasn’t the worst mistake I’ve made online (let’s be real) but I wanted to seem responsible and intelligent, just in case I get that column one day.

Not every person who goes down the polling station will know the difference between Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy– but at least when you leave your house, you’re making a clear and conscious effort to vote for a specific party- online, it might be just too easy. I like accessibility, but politics shouldn’t be dumbed down for people- only spoken in a way that’s easy to understand.

Shoutout to the PM for triggering this snap election, this article probably wouldn’t be here otherwise. Probably wouldn’t be a terrible loss to be fair.

As a blogger and a teenager, I’m also aware of the sub-species known as trolls, who congregate on the interwebs. Most of the die hard trolls (the type who only type in caps lock and drink Mountain Dew) would vote for the funniest candidate- because everything’s just one big joke to them. I know we need higher voter turnouts, especially from the 18-24 slice, but filling this gap with trolls just doesn’t seem like a good idea. 

I also know that politics can be a sensitive subject. Don’t get me wrong- getting as many people talking about politics is important, but as I said before- online voting could lead to more irrational voting, which would encourage irrational debate. What I’m saying is that people should be talking about POLICY and AGENDA on social media- not blindly shouting (metaphorically scrawling in crayon) about the part they voted for.

In summary, keeping the voting system limited to paper ballots would keep the trolls out, and encourage people to find out more about their candidates policies and agenda.

Thank you for your time…


  1. making it more difficult to vote isnt the hallmark of democracy. making it easy ensures that the largest number of people are represented. being elitist and suggesting that only people who “go to the trouble to vote” should be able to, is not wise or decent or just.

    that said, electronic voting ensures fraud. and while easy voting is actually good for democracy, fraud is the opposite of what you want (if you want votes to count.) thats why electronic voting (voting by any means other than paper– electronic counting is fine, because a recount can be done by hand) should *never* be part of national elections.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for your feedback. I agree with you, and am a pluralist person, but I think that (like you said) it will encourage donkey voting and we should look to other meaningful means of participation.
      It’s interesting actually, writing about this drew my attention to compulsory voting- and I think some of the arguments are quite similar. What do you think?

      Liked by 1 person

      • i suppose if jury duty can be constitutional then so can the draft and mandatory voting, but a non-vote is a valid vote imo and should be both possible and counted as such (per the census, i guess.)

        so long as its counted as such, it might as well be possible to cast it by not going. if senators can abstain or not show up without getting arrested, voters should have the same “privilege.” its disturbing when people talk about the “practical side” of giving up freedom. “well, voting would work better.” yes, but it should be voluntary regardless. a mandatory democracy should be a contradiction in terms.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s